November 15, 2003

Quick Links

A special expanded edition tonight!

Is porn beginning to beat a retreat? - She obviously hasn't seen my inbox lately....

Allard blasts Daschle for leaving Senate debate to attend Denver fundraiser - Daschle is saddened by the accusations. But not enough to refrain from accusing Allard of hypocrisy.

BROKER BLASTS MARTHA IN COURT - More on Martha. But in her lawyer's assault on the broker's invocation of the Fifth Amendment, isn't he still in jeopardy until he's sentenced and therefore his use of the Fifth Amendment protection would still be justified?

New Service Is the Last Word in E-Mail (link requires registration) - $9.99 for the ability to send email from beyond the grave during the next three years. I guess people will pay for just about anything.

Slavery lives on in Sudan - Is anyone really surprised that slavery would still exist in a land of dhimmitude?

Baby Sitter Arrested, Accused Of Witchcraft, Satanism - Actually she was charged with giving the kids alcohol, but that doesn't sound as freaky as witchcraft and satanism, now does it?

U.N.: Al Qaeda Trying to Use WMDs - Gee, it is nice to see the UN might actually be waking up to the facts of the real world.

Energy Bill Would Impose Power Grid Rules - Great. Another big government answer. Got a problem? Solve it with more government rules and regulation!

Democrat Blanco Wins La. Governor's Race - Well, they had to win something, right?

Blame Israel, says Red Cross as it ends food aid for West Bank - Whoa! I'm confused. They're stopping emergency food aid because of an economic collapse in the West Bank that they claim is being engineered by....THE JEWS!!!! Isn't an economic collapse the time when food aid is needed most? Is the Red Cross only supportive when it isn't desperately needed?

U.S. businesses take sides on free trade arret ea (sic) spanning Western Hemisphere - There are two sides to every story. Always interesting when they meet in a small town.

Three Brokerages Face Charges Over Discounts - American Express, Wachovia and Legg Mason join the parade of mutual fund miscreants. This is a complete and total failure on the part of the regulators at every level.

Posted by Chris at November 15, 2003 11:04 PM | TrackBack | Linked by:

Comments

I've enjoyed reading your weblog. I have a question though. You complain about "more government rules and regulation" with respect to the power grid, but then you note that "This is a complete and total failure on the part of the regulators at every level" with respect to the mutual fund scandals. I was wondering, why is the addition of regulations for the power grid a bad thing (when we saw the problem with an unregulated system earlier this year), while it appears from your statements that the regulations of the mutual fund system are a good thing that should be enforced? Just wondering what you felt the differences were.

Posted by: Jack at November 15, 2003 11:28 PM

Excellent question, Jack and I'm glad you asked.

Brokerage firms are not directly regulated by the government. Yes, the SEC has enforcement responsbility for violations of the various and sundry securities acts, but the actual regulation in the brokerage industry is done by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), an industry group, which actually acts as the industry watchdog.

With most brokerage firm issues the SEC doesn't get involved. The NASD handles them and generally has done a decent job of self-policing.

The problem with the mutual fund scandal is that the NASD had multiple avenues from which to catch the problem before it made it to the point of an official governmental inquiry.

Now the NASD isn't the only organization guilty of failure here. Each and every brokerage firm also has a compliance department, which is supposed to keep the brokers and traders in check and legal.

The compliance departments failed and so did the NASD. That is why I called it a failure at every level of the regulatory chain. It is, it just happens that this time the regulation isn't supposed to be enforced by the government. A self regulating organization or SRO like the NASD is similar to a governmental regulator, but with a little more flexibility to apply common sense (something that isn't done as frequently as it should be).

The main difference between the two issues is that in the case of the mutual funds the laws (they actually aren't regulations, but are law passed by Congress) are already on the books and have been since the 1930s. The organizations to regulate the industry are already in place, they simply need to be more vigilant in their duties.

With the power grid, they're talking about creating new regulation which will lead to the creation of new bureaucracy which will hamper our ability to apply common sense to future issues with the grid. I don't know what the ultimate solution to the power grid problems will be, but I firmly believe that the solution does not involve more regulation.

Posted by: Chris at November 15, 2003 11:48 PM


Comments have been closed on this entry in an effort to conserve disk space. If you have feedback on this entry, please email me at blog - at - cbnoble.com.