April 05, 2003

Special Ops vs. Fedayeen

Al Jazeera has another interesting article today about the use of non-uniformed troops by both sides. They attempt to equate the coalition Special Ops guys with the Fedayeen on a tactics level (they don't approach the moral equivalency question). They correctly point out that both organizations use deceit and deception to approach their target without being detected. Both groups wear civilian clothes in carrying out their missions. And they basically ask why it's OK for the coalition to do so, but not for the Iraqis.

At first glance, my reaction was along the lines of "they might be right." I had to take a few minutes to examine the differences to find why one tactic is legit while the other is illegal. I was about to get really ticked at the military for being grossly hypocritical.

But then it hit, while both sides use deception, the goals are different. And the goal makes the difference in the legitimacy.

Coalition Special Ops use deception to get close enough to gather intelligence, to plant explosives to go off later, or to illuminate a target for someone in uniform to attack. They are essentially acting in the roles of spies during these missions. They are not looking to directly attack a military formation or group of enemy soldiers. During those operations where the will directly take on the enemy (rescue missions, etc.) they do wear uniforms.

The Fedayeen, on the other hand, use deceit and deception to directly attack our military men. If they are operating under the control of the Iraq military command structure, that would be a violation of the Geneva Conventions. If they are locally organized and controlled, it would not be a violation (but the prisoners taken would not be POWs and would not be subject to the Geneva Convention -just like our Special Ops guys wouldn't be if captured out of uniform).

I've always felt the Fedayeen attacks were controlled and directed by the Iraqi military command and were therefore a form of fighting dirty. I had never even thought about the possibility of someone being able to question our Special Ops. Every once in a while it’s good to occasionally re-examine deep held beliefs, even when you know that they’re right.


Posted by Chris at April 5, 2003 10:37 AM | TrackBack | Linked by:

Comments

I'm not so sure about your defense of special-ops. You basically say that _they_ are not wrong because they just sneak in an plant explosives (among many non-combative activities, I admit), while the Fedayeen sneak up and attack soldiers.

Doesn't that kind of put US special ops in the terrorist camp and the Fedayeen in the soldier camp? Special ops sounds like Al-Qiada and the Fedayeen sounds like the Minutemen of the American Revolution.

To be honest, I'm not sure how one can try to apply morality to the actions of soldiers in a war. We might not be on the same side as the Fedayeen, but this obsession with showing them to be immoral is unbecoming of Americans. Remember Red Dawn? It was one of my favorite movies in High School. What would you do if this country were invaded by another? Wouldn't you attempt to put up the best fight possible? I would! Why meet the enemy in the open field when you know you don't have a chance. We've been bombing their field units. Given a choice between dying by daisy cutter and sneaking up to the enemy and at least getting a shot in before my death, I would choose the latter.

And so would you and every other blue-blooded American.

The Fedayeen are our enemy. But they aren't cowards and they aren't terrorists. They are soldiers doing the very best they can to be as effective as possible against an overwhelmingly powerful invader.

If the US were occupied I would use their type of tactics against the occupiers. If that brought down the wrath of a foreign government upon my fellow citizens that should not be my concern. Any American who is unwilling to die defending this country is a coward! Well, don't you think it looks the same to the Fedayeen?

We are going to win. They don't have a chance. They are going to die. Die. Can't we at least have the grant them the dignity of admitting they have been worthy adversaries.

Posted by: Jack at April 5, 2003 03:16 PM


Comments have been closed on this entry in an effort to conserve disk space. If you have feedback on this entry, please email me at blog - at - cbnoble.com.