February 25, 2003
Mr. Saddam?
Another question that came up was why is it that Saddam is always referred to by just his first name? Nobody ever says "Well George W. said this today" or "Tony said that today" or "Jacques got in the American's way by"......well, you get the point. What makes Saddam so special that he gets first name treatment from everyone?
Maybe someone in my vast throngs of readership can provide the answer.
Posted by Chris at February 25, 2003 10:30 PM | TrackBack | Linked by:Calling someone by their first name doesn't make them seem as threatening, plus it conveys a lack of respect for the person.
It's like referring to your boss or someone by their first name instead of "Mr. So-and So." It conveys a level of familiarty inappropriate to your relationship, as well as making them seem (in your mind) just like you by tearing away all those honorifics.
In my line of work, officers are always (well, supposed to be) referred to by rank and last name by those they outrank; however, they can call you by your first name (there's a whole realm of material to explore in just that fact). If Col. X is an unrepentant asshole, most people will call him by his first name behind his back. (ie, "Okay Bob, I'll get right on that.") Doing that strips away the poofery and aura of authority and makes him seem like a regular human being no better than yourself.
Posted by: Paul at February 26, 2003 01:33 AMComments have been closed on this entry in an effort to conserve disk space. If you have feedback on this entry, please email me at blog - at - cbnoble.com.


